Commenti a: Functional setter Java idiom http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html Linguaggio Scala, Java, AS400 e...cose più serie Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:30:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 Di: alepuzio http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html#comment-7449 alepuzio Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:40:08 +0000 http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html#comment-7449 I agree, then do you think that the change of "convention" not create problems in web apps "old style"? :) My doubt is about the manutenibility when you code from "JavaBean world" to "Fluent Interface world" >DSL-like manner It's better ;) I agree, then do you think that the change of “convention” not create problems in web apps “old style”? :)

My doubt is about the manutenibility when you code from “JavaBean world” to “Fluent Interface world”

>DSL-like manner
It’s better ;)

]]> Di: Franco Lombardo http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html#comment-7447 Franco Lombardo Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:58:15 +0000 http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html#comment-7447 @alepuzio There is no problem, because I don't use Struts :-) More seriously, obviously in this particular case, fluent interfaces (or functional setters as I love to call them :-) ) are just setters that return the object itself, so I think they should work even with Struts. Anyway, fluent interfaces are intended to develop in a DSL-like manner, not in the "old JavaBeans" standard. @alepuzio

There is no problem, because I don’t use Struts :-)
More seriously, obviously in this particular case, fluent interfaces (or functional setters as I love to call them :-) ) are just setters that return the object itself, so I think they should work even with Struts.
Anyway, fluent interfaces are intended to develop in a DSL-like manner, not in the “old JavaBeans” standard.

]]> Di: alepuzio http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html#comment-7444 alepuzio Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:52:33 +0000 http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html#comment-7444 Hi, It'a good systems: the only problem, in my opinion, is that some framwork (as Struts) work with the hypothesis that the developer is coding with JavaBean's standards ( void setAttribute(XXX xxx) ). Coding in Fluent Interface's way, dont you break this hypothesis ? Bye Hi,
It’a good systems: the only problem, in my opinion, is that some framwork (as Struts) work with the hypothesis that the developer is coding with JavaBean’s standards ( void setAttribute(XXX xxx) ).
Coding in Fluent Interface’s way, dont you break this hypothesis ?

Bye

]]> Di: Franco Lombardo http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html#comment-7188 Franco Lombardo Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:38:31 +0000 http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html#comment-7188 Oh, good pointer Gabriele: I need to read more next time! :-) Oh, good pointer Gabriele: I need to read more next time! :-)

]]> Di: gabriele renzi http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html#comment-7184 gabriele renzi Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:41:52 +0000 http://www.francolombardo.net/functional-setter-java-idiom_post-92.html#comment-7184 I believe this is what is usually called a fulent interface http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluent_interface And yes, it is a nice idea :) I believe this is what is usually called a fulent interface http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluent_interface
And yes, it is a nice idea :)

]]>